As I mentioned earlier, Rep. Miller (R,MI) introduced HR 910,
the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Safety Technology Investment Flexibility Act of
2015. The bill would add vehicle-to-infrastructure projects to the
allowable projects list for three separate federal highway grant programs. No
new money is added to any of the programs.
First the bill would modify 29
USC 101(a) by adding a definition of ‘vehicle-to-infrastructure communication
equipment’. The definition is fairly generic; describing it as “equipment that
provides a wireless exchange of critical safety and operational data between
highway infrastructure and vehicles” {§101(a)(35)
added}. There is nothing in the definition that mentions, even in passing or by
suggestion, the cybersecurity issues associated with such communications.
Then the bill adds the installation of
vehicle-to-infrastructure communications equipment as an allowable use to each
of the three following grant programs:
∙ National Highway Performance
Program {29
USC 119(d)(2)};
∙ Surface Transportation Program {29
USC 133(b)}; and
∙ Highway Safety Improvement Program {29
USC 148(a)(4)(B)}
Since there are no new funds added to these grant program
there is unlikely to be any specific opposition to this bill. As always it will
be a matter of getting the bill to be considered. While Rep. Candice Miller is
a member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, she is not
on the Highways and Transit Subcommittee (one of only 7 Republicans out of 35
that are not on that subcommittee) that would consider the bill. It will be
interesting to see if she has enough pull with Chairman Shuster (R,PA) to get
the Committee to consider the bill.
If it does make it to the floor of the House for a vote, it
will most likely be under a suspension of the rules process with virtually no
debate and certainly no amendments. If cybersecurity issues do make it into the
bill it will be during the committee markup process.
Cybersecurity Commentary
With all of the recent discussion about vehicular
cybersecurity issues, it is really surprising and more than a little disturbing
that a bill that provides financial incentives for promoting
vehicle-to-infrastructure communications has no mention of cybersecurity
issues. Even with cybersecurity being a major topic for discussion in Congress,
its real consequences remain overlooked.
No comments:
Post a Comment