On Thursday, before the Senate adjourned for the weekend,
Sen Reed (D,RI) proposed SA 5499 for HR 7900, the FY 2023 National Defense Authorization
Act which passed
in the House back in July. The amendment proposes to substitute the
language from S
4543 for the language in the House bill. This is the first step in the
process of the consideration of HR 7900, which should probably begin this week.
Saturday, September 17, 2022
Senate Substitute Language for HR 7499 Proposed – FY 2023 NDAA
Thursday, September 8, 2022
Senate Consideration of S 4543 – FY 2023 NDAA
While the Senate has not yet officially taken up S 4543, the FY 2023 National Defense Authorization Act, the first steps in that consideration were reflected in yesterday’s Congressional Record, eight amendments were proposed for consideration when the bill is brought to the floor of the Senate. While none of the amendments are of specific interest here, these amendments reflect the understanding of the proposers that the Senate will be taking up the bill.
All of yesterday’s amendments were proposed to S 4543. It is
not clear at this point if the Senate will take up that bill or the House
version of the NDAA, HR
7900, that was passed
in the House back in July. If the Senate takes up the House bill, the first
amendment that will be considered is substituting the language of S 4543 for
the House language.
Friday, August 5, 2022
Review - S 4543 Introduced – FY 2023 NDAA
Last month, Sen Reed (D,RI) introduced S 4543, the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023. The Senate Armed Services Committee published their Report on the bill. The bill contains some cybersecurity provisions, and the Report includes specific recommendations for increased cybersecurity spending over the amounts requested in the budget.
Moving Forward
The National Defense Authorization Act is a ‘must pass’ piece of legislation. The House took up and passed their version of the bill (HR 7900) last month. When the Senate takes up that bill after the Summer Recess, their first action will be to amend the bill with substitute language based on S 4543.
Interestingly, one amendment has already been submitted in
the Senate for S 4543, SA
5190. That amendment would add a new section entitled: “Requirement for
Information Sharing Agreements.” This new section would be essentially the same
language as found in S 4000. It is not clear at this point whether or not this
section would be added to the substitute language used as the basis for Senate consideration
of HR 7900.
For more details about the provisions of the bill and changes
in cybersecurity spending, see my article at CFSN Detailed Analysis - https://patrickcoyle.substack.com/p/s-4543-introduced
- subscription required.