Looking at the House and Senate Appropriations Committees web
site, the CJS-EWR-IER spending
bill I described
earlier today is a joint effort of the two committees. Thus, the bill is
being treated by the leadership of the two houses as a conference bill. That
means that the bill will probably come to the floor in the House under a closed
rule, with limited debate and no floor amendments. The Senate leadership will
attempt to consider the bill under similar circumstances.
The Republican fringe could still block the Rule being
considered this evening with three votes in the Rules Committee. Or they could
block the rule on the floor of the House (where Democrats would be expected to
vote against the rule on general principles, though that is not a requirement).
In either case the bill could be brought to the floor under suspension of the
rules where the supermajority requirement would be met with votes from
Democrats and moderate Republicans.
Both appropriation committee web sites (House
and Senate)
provide background information on the bill. They provide links to bill summaries
for each of the three Divisions and tables of the congressional earmarks (called
‘Community Project Funding’ on the House page and ‘Congressionally Directed
Funding’ on the Senate page). The Senate page provides links to the Joint Explanatory
Statement for each Division. Those statements explain the spending allocations
supporting the bill, as well as the differences between the language in the
Division and in the two original spending bills for the Division. The Senate
Appropriations Committee also provides a press
release from Sen Murray (D,WA), the Ranking Member explaining the support
of the Democrats for the minibus.
For more information on the supporting documents, see my
article at CFSN Detailed Analysis - https://patrickcoyle.substack.com/p/more-on-new-minibus-spending-bill
- subscription required.