Ever since the West
Fertilizer explosion in 2013, I periodically get asked if the Chemical
Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) program helps prevent facility fires.
The answer is complicated, but generally speaking no, that is not the direct
intent of the program; the CFATS is a security program not a safety program.
Having said that, it is complicated and worth an additional look.
Safety and Security
Anyone that has worked in an industrial workplace knows that
safety and security are intertwined. Security obviously prevents incidents that
are the result of malicious intent and those events, if successfully carried
out have safety consequences. A terrorist attack could certainly cause a fire
at a facility; preventing the attack would certainly prevent the associated
fire.
But effective safety programs are also a good way to
mitigate the effects of a malicious act. Effective fire prevention and
mitigation activities would reduce the negative effects of a successful
terrorist attack that was intended to start a fire. So, part of an effective
security plan is good integration with the facility safety activities.
Emergency Response
Planned and coordinated on-site and off-site emergency
response is an important part of both facility security and safety plans. Both
plans must address the potential failure to prevent the unwanted outcomes
associated with either a security or safety incident. In fact, the undesirable
consequences of either type event are frequently identical. Thus, there needs
to be coordination of the emergency response portions of both the security and
safety plans for the facility.
CFATS and Safety Incidents
One thing that facility security officers need to remember
is that the response to a safety incident is going to have a potentially
significant effect on the facility security plan. A fire at a facility is going
to disrupt all activities at the facility, especially the security activities.
An emergency response from outside agencies is going to bring a large number of
people into the facility that may or may not be familiar with the security
controls in place. And if those security controls interfere with the operations
of emergency response personnel the facility and its staff will suffer.
A site security plan should include actions to be taken to
increase security during both security and safety incidents. The increase in
traffic into the facility by emergency response personnel, the appearance of
crowds of bystanders watching the event and the presence of TV and print news
crews along the facility perimeter all need to be taken into account when
planning on how to respond to such events. Facilities that have to rely on
volunteer fire departments are going to have a special problem with quickly
identifying incoming emergency response personnel.
Security plans are also going to have to be able to deal
with post incident cleanup activities. While CFATS rules provide for unescorted
access to facilities by emergency response personnel during an incident, they
do not provide an exemption for post-incident response personnel. After a
significant safety event a wide variety of new and unusual personnel are going
to be required to have access to the facility. This obviously includes
environmental remediation teams at chemical facilities but will also include a
variety of government and insurance company investigators. There could also be
engineering and construction personnel that will be involved in planning for
and executing facility repairs. All of these personnel are going to have to be accommodated
by either vetting through the personnel surety program or more likely being escorted
by facility personnel.
No comments:
Post a Comment