Yesterday the Coast Guard published two notices in the
Federal Register (84
FR 2799-2800 and 84
FR 2800-2801) announcing the withdrawal of two long-dormant rulemakings
concerning hazardous-substance spill response plans for marine transportation
related facilities and tank vessels. These rulemakings, dating back to 2000
and 1999
respectively, were intended to expand the existing oil spill response plan
requirements to hazardous substances. In both instances the CG justified the
withdrawal of the rulemakings by noting that: “the
proposed rules are no longer appropriate to the current state of spill response
in the chemical industry”.
Neither of these rulemakings had been on the Active Unified
Agenda since I have been watching that for this blog until the Trump Administration
added them back to the Active Agenda for the Fall
2017 Unified Agenda. It is now apparent that it was added simply because
the Coast Guard was reviewing the rulemakings to be determined if they should
be withdrawn.
Both announcements carefully note that:
The withdrawal of the NPRM
qualifies as a deregulatory action under Executive Order 13771 (Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs), which directs agencies to reduce
regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that “for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for
elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently managed and
controlled through a budgeting process.”
No comments:
Post a Comment