Last Friday Rep Ratcliffe (R,TX) introduced HR 3490, the StrengtheningState and Local Cyber Crime Fighting Act. The bill authorizes the existing National Computer Forensics Institute
that is run by the United States Secret Service.
The bill would add a new section to Subtitle C of title VIII
of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. Section 822 (would become 6 USC 383)
would require the Institute to provide training to, and conduct information
sharing with, State, local and tribal law enforcement and court officials on {new
§822(b)(1)}:
∙ Cyber and electronic crimes and related threats, including
threats of terrorism or acts of terrorism;
∙ Methods for investigating cyber and electronic crimes, including
crimes related to threats of terrorism or acts of terrorism, and conducting
computer and mobile device forensic examinations; and
∙ Prosecutorial
and judicial challenges related to cyber and electronic crimes, and computer
and mobile device forensic examinations.
The bill also authorizes the Institute to provide “computer
equipment, hardware, software, manuals, and tools necessary to conduct cyber
and electronic crimes investigations and computer and mobile device forensic
examinations” {§822(d)} to State, local, tribal and territorial officials.
The bill would also requires that the Secret Service expand
its network of “Electronic Crime Task Forces through the addition of task force
officers of State, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement officers,
prosecutors, and judges educated and trained at the Institute, in addition to
academia and private sector stakeholders” {§822(e)}.
No new funds or personnel are authorized by this bill.
Moving Forward
Ratcliffe is Chairman of the Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies Subcommittee of the House Homeland
Security Committee and is a member of the Judiciary Committee, so he is well
placed to move this bill forward. In fact, it is scheduled for a
markup hearing before his Subcommittee on Thursday. And it does not hurt
that the Homeland Security Chair is a cosponsor of the bill.
This is essentially a housekeeping bill since it is
providing formal authorization for an existing organization. As such it will
certainly come to the floor under suspension of the rules and will pass with
bipartisan support. It would have a good chance of making it to the floor of
the Senate under their unanimous consent process.
Commentary
There is no wording in the bill that would indicate that the
Institute should be looking at control system issues, but, then again, it does
not specifically mention IT either. It would seem, however, that the Institute
does not currently have much interest in control system issues. Their current course list does
not list anything that would pertain to control system investigation tools or
techniques.
Since we have not had any publicly acknowledge control
system incursions in the United States that resulted in any damage or injuries,
it really is not surprising that there is no law enforcement or judicial
attention applied to this threat. It would be nice if language requiring such
attention were added to the bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment