With two weeks left before the long summer vacation Congress
starts to look more at the bills that can pass rather than the legislation that
is needed. There are only two hearings that will be of interest to the chemical
security community and only S 3414 possibly on the horizon for the
cybersecurity community. The two House hearings of interest are a homeland
threat assessment and a CFATS Hearing.
Homeland Threat Assessment
The House Homeland Security Committee will be holding
a hearing Wednesday on “Understanding the Homeland Threat Landscape”.
Secretary Napolitano and the National Counterterrorism Center Director Matthew
Olsen are the only witnesses currently scheduled to testify. This is scheduled
as an open hearing so there won’t be anything really interesting here.
CFATS Hearing
On Thursday the House Appropriations Committee will be holding
a hearing on the Chemical Facility Antiterrorism Standards (CFATS) program.
It seems kind of odd timing for such a hearing before this Committee as the DHS
spending bill that already passed in the House had the CFATS funding cut in
half by the Committee.
Having said that it looks like this may be an important
hearing for the future of the CFATS program. No one from ISCD is scheduled to
testify. The DHS witness is Under Deputy Secretary Suzanne Spaulding, the
number two person at NPPD. She won’t have much personal insight into the source
of the problems at ISCD since she just joined NPPD in November, but the
Committee will probably be pressing here for info on the steps being taken to
correct the problem.
The most important witness, however, will be Director Steve
Caldwell, of the GAO’s Homeland Security & Justice Issues. The report that
he presents to the Committee will be the first real outside look at this
program since its inception in 2007. It will certainly be the first definitive
look at CFATS since its problems were publicly identified in December.
It is unfortunate that the first real look at these problems
has to come from the Appropriations Committee, particularly after this year’s
appropriations process has been almost completed. But the Senate Homeland
Security Committee has completely ignored their oversight responsibility and
the House Homeland Security and the Energy and Commerce Committees held
hearings that were even less effective than the NPPD oversight of the program.
So it is left to the Appropriations Committee to take care of a problem that
was created in an appropriations bill.
The Appropriations Committee does have one more potential
time to affect the CFATS program this session. That is when the DHS spending
bill comes before the conference committee to iron out the inevitable
differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. Unless this
hearing produces some news of an overwhelming turnaround at ISCD (and there has
been no public performance to date that would indicate that) I would expect
that this committee’s leadership will insist on their draconian cuts of the
funding for the CFATS program; cuts that were not questioned in the House
consideration of the bill.
S 3414
The Senate does not publish a weekly schedule of what it
will be considering (it doesn’t know itself that far in advance), but it is
looking increasingly likely that S 3414 may actually make it to the floor this
week. News
reports seem to indicate that the privacy advocates are satisfied with this
revision and we have heard
little from the business community. If they have no serious objections the
Senate might start consideration of this bill. If they do there will be lots of
amendments to be considered and I doubt that the bill will be passed this week.
It still won’t be taken up by the House until after the election (if then) in
any case.
No comments:
Post a Comment