Last week Rep. Miller (R,MI) introduced HR 3568
the Border and Maritime Coordination Improvement Act. The bill would add a
number of new sections to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 dealing with
maritime security issues. Only a few of those provisions will be of specific
interest to readers of this blog.
Joint Task Forces
The bill adds a new §420A
to the Homeland Security Act that establishes a number of new border security
joint task forces to “conduct joint operations using Department component and
office personnel and capabilities to secure the international borders of the
United States” {new §420A(a)}.
It provides for three specific task forces (East, West, and
Investigation). The bill also provides authority for the Secretary to establish
a number of other task forces, including one specifically to deal with
cybersecurity {new §420A(i)(4)}.
There are no details provided on what the purpose of a cybersecurity joint task
force or how it might be constituted.
New TWIC Requirements
A new §420D
is added to address concerns about Transportation Workers Identification
Credentials (TWIC) being issued to non-US citizen applicants. The purpose of
the new procedures outlined in this section are to ensure that “an individual who
is not lawfully present in the United States cannot obtain or continue to use a
Transportation Worker Identification Credential” {new §420D(a)}.
The language would require the Secretary to publish a list
of documents that would provide acceptable proof that an applicant’s identity
and legal presence in the United States. Additionally, a training program would
have to be established to ensure that personnel processing TWIC applications
from non-US citizens could detect fraudulent documents.
Finally the expiration of TWICs issued to non-US citizens
would be changed so that they would expire on “the date of its expiration, or
on the date on which the individual to whom such a TWIC is issued is no longer
lawfully present in the United States, whichever is earlier” {new §420D(c)}.
Moving Forward
Miller is the Chair of the Border and Maritime Security
Subcommittee of the House Homeland Security Committee and the Committee Chair,
Rep. McCaul (R,TX) is a co-sponsor of this bill. This bill will certainly move
through the committee process. In fact, it is one of the bills scheduled to be marked
up by the full Committee on Wednesday.
There is supposed to be substitute language for this bill
offered by Miller, but that language has not yet been published. I suspect that
this will be the only amendment offered to this bill and it will almost
certainly be approved by a voice vote. If that is the case this bill will most
likely move to the floor of the House by the end of the year under suspension
of the rules.
Commentary
The adding of cybersecurity to the list of task forces that
could be formed by the Secretary is kind of odd. The only other proposed or
suggested task force that is not specifically designed to look at border
control issues is suggested to be established in response to a major terrorist
incident.
I suppose that since this bill established the bureaucratic
guidelines for the establishment of joint agency task forces within the Department,
it does make a certain amount of sense, but burying the provision in the US
Customs Services portion of the statute still raises more questions then it
answers. It will be interesting to see how/if this is specifically addressed in
the Committee Report on this bill.
The TWIC provisions in this bill fall under the heading of ‘what
has taken so long?’ I can see this providing some problems for people who are
working here under renewable immigration documents. It is going to be costly
for them to renew their TWIC more frequently than US citizens, but I don’t
suspect that that was really part of the consideration for this measure.
I was kind of disappointed that this opportunity wasn’t
taken to specifically include authorization for TWICs to be issued to employees
of CFATS covered facilities. That would be a significant expansion in the
number of TWICs to be issued, but I suspect that we are going to be seeing this
happen in any course as the CFATS personnel surety program starts to ramp up.
Specifically authorizing this would allow for a coordinated expansion of the
program rather than a reactive expansion of capability in response to an ‘unexpected’
increase in the number of applications.
No comments:
Post a Comment