The bulk of this notice is a response to the single public
comment that was submitted directly to the FRA as a result of the
60-day
notice on this ICR renewal. That comment was jointly submitted by the Association
of American Railroads (AAR) and the American Short Line and Regional Railroad
Association (ASLRRA). The FRA is apparently going to ignore the
three
public comments submitted via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Admittedly
those comments are more about crude train hazards than about the actual ICR and
thus probably don’t require specific comments.
The railroad comment reportedly objected to the SERC
reporting requirements of the emergency order on three grounds:
• The routing information is
sensitive information on a security basis and thus should be protected from
subsequent disclosure;
• The routing information is
sensitive information on a commercial competitive information basis and thus
should be protected from subsequent disclosure; and
• The reporting requirement is
duplicative of voluntary industry standard disclosure and thus un-necessary.
FRA dismisses the security sensitive claim by noting that
the information does not fall under any of the fifteen enumerated categories of
sensitive security information (SSI) set forth in 49 CFR
§15.5
or
§1520.5.
It is interesting, going back and closely reading those categories of
information that there is only one specific reference to rail transportation
security and it would not appear to apply in this instance;
“(8) Security Measures. Specific
details of aviation, maritime, or rail transportation security measures, both
operational and technical, whether applied directly by the Federal government
or another person”
There is another DOT regulation that makes railroad hazmat route
information SSI. Section
172.820(i)(2)
[.PDF Download] specifically applies SSI rules to such routing information for selected
hazardous material shipments; toxic inhalation hazard railcars, for instance.
Crude oil railcars are not currently included in this category. Interestingly the
PHMSA
High Hazard Flammable Trains NPMR would modify §172.802(a) to include
trains carrying 20 car loads of flammable liquids. This would place the routes
for crude oil trains of 100 cars clearly under the SSI requirements.
The sixteenth category (Secretarial discretion for either
DOT or DHS) in both of the SSI rules is dealt with by
noting that “DOT
finds no basis to conclude that the public disclosure of the information is
detrimental to transportation safety”. Given the fact that DOT has a rulemaking
in progress that that specifies that these train routes require SSI protection,
the decision by the Secretary not to designate this material as SSI requires
some serious reconsideration either in this ICR or in the proposed changes in
the NPMR.
The FRA response on the business confidentiality issue is
also interesting. Their claim is that since the disclosures are made to State
agencies not the Federal government, then State disclosure laws apply and it is
out of the hands of DOT. This is the reason that most rules requiring sensitive
information disclosure to State and local government agencies specifically
spell out that the disclosures are exempt from State and local government
disclosure laws.
Finally, the FRA notes that voluntary disclosures are all
well and good, but they are voluntary and may fall short of the requirements of
the emergency order without penalty. Placing the requirements in the emergency
order provides DOT with a way to enforce the requirement.
FRA is soliciting public comments on this 30-day ICR notice.
Comments should be sent directly to the OMB’s Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs. They may be sent by email (
oira_submissions@omb.eop.gov).
Comments should arrive by November 3
rd, 2014.
Posts
