Review - HR 7073 Introduced – Next-Gen Pipelines

Last month, Rep Weber (R,TX) introduced HR 7073, the Next Generation Pipelines Research. The bill would require the Department of Energy to establish a new grant program to “carry out demonstration projects on low- to mid-technology readiness level subjects to achieve deployment of technologies”. It would also require DOE and DOT to conduct a joint R&D program to carry out basic research projects. Finally, the bill would require DOE to establish the National Pipeline Modernization Center. Also incluces a new NIST pipeline metrology program. The bill would authorize $50-million, $30-million, $15-million, and $1.5 million through 2028 for the four new programs.

This bill is very similar to HR 9349 [removed from paywall] introduced by Webber in the 117^th Congress. Most of the changes are editorial in nature; §4 of the earlier bill, for instance, is changed to include the earlier language in a new §40344 to be added to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (PL 117-158). The major change, however, is that a new §8 has been added to the bill that would provide an off-set for the new spending authorized in the bill by reducing funding in §10771, Department of Energy research, development, and demonstration activities, of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act (PL 117-167), after extending that spending authorization through 2028. The new version of the bill also adds a new §7, NIST Pipeline Metrology, authorized at $2.5-million per year through 2028.

HR 9349 was introduced too late in the 117^th Congress for any action to be taken.

Moving Forward

Webber and his three cosponsors {Rep Caraveo (D,CO), Rep Lucas (R,CO), and Rep Obernolte (R,CA)} are all members of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee to which this bill was assigned for consideration. This means that there may be sufficient influence to see this bill considered in Committee. I do not see anything in the legislation that would engender organized opposition. I suspect that there would be bipartisan support for the bill, but I am not sure that it would be sufficient to allow the bill to move to the floor of the House under the suspension of the rules process.

Commentary

Webber’s staff has done an interesting job of neutralizing the money problem with this bill. Since no new monies are authorized, the fiscal hawks are less likely to object to the bill. The extension of the existing spending authorizations (albeit at somewhat reduced levels), give the environmental folks a reason to support the bill. And, of course, industry is sure to support federal funding of pipeline research efforts.

 

For more details about the provisions of this bill, see my article at CFSN Detailed Analysis - https://patrickcoyle.substack.com/p/hr-7073-introduced - subscription required.

Review - HR 9349 Introduced – NextGen Pipelines

Earlier this month, Rep Weber (R,TX) introduced HR 9349, the Next Generation Pipelines Research and Development Act. The bill would require the Department of Energy to establish a new grant program to “carry out demonstration projects on low- to mid-technology readiness level subjects to achieve deployment of technologies”. It would also require DOE and DOT to conduct a joint R&D program to carry out basic research projects. Finally, the bill would require DOE to establish the National Pipeline Modernization Center. The bill would authorize $50-million, $30-million and $15-million through 2027 for the three new programs.

Moving Forward

Weber, and all six of his cosponsors {Rep Lucas (R,OK), Rep LaTurner (R,KS), Rep Carey (R,OH), Rep Obernolte (R,CA), Rep Kim (R,CA), Rep Babin (R,TX)} are members of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee to which this bill was assigned for consideration. Even without any Democratic sponsors, this bill could have been considered in Committee earlier in the session, but it is certainly too late for this bill to be considered in this session. It will probably be re-introduced next session.

Commentary

There is a cybersecurity focus outlined in §4 of the bill, but some additional language could have been added to some of the technical focus areas outlined in the Demonstration Initiative to make it clear that cybersecurity should be an integrated part of any technological solution. For example, §4(b)(5) could have been changed to read:

(5) Advanced sensor technologies and processes that enable real-time or in situ monitoring of pipeline assets to assess and mitigate leaks, both internal and external to the pipeline, including communications security processes to protect data flowing from sensors to pipeline control systems, which may include the following:”

 

For more details about the provisions of this bill see my article at CFSN Detailed Analysis - https://patrickcoyle.substack.com/p/hr-9349-introduced-nextgen-pipelines - subscription required.

Bills Introduced – 11-17-22

Yesterday, with both the House and Senate in session (and preparing to leave Washington for their Thanksgiving weekend) there were 80 bills introduced. Three of those bills may receive additional attention in this blog:

HR 9330 To improve the visibility, accountability, and oversight of agency software asset management practices, and for other purposes. Cartwright, Matt [Rep.-D-PA-8]

HR 9337 To amend the USA PATRIOT Act to designate critical infrastructures, and for other purposes. Jackson, Ronny [Rep.-R-TX-13]

HR 9349 To improve public-private partnerships and increase Federal research, development, and demonstration related to the evolution of next generation pipeline systems, and for other purposes. Weber, Randy K., Sr. [Rep.-R-TX-14] 

I will be watching HR 9330 for language and definitions that specifically include operational technology software (control systems, security systems, and/or building control systems) within the scope of the coverage of the bill.

I will be covering HR 9337.

I will be watching HR 9349 for language and definitions that would include cybersecurity requirements in the next generation pipeline system development supported in the bill.