Bills Introduced – 07-13-16

With just one day left before the House and Senate start their 7-week summer recess we are starting to see a sharp increase in the number of bills introduced with 89 bills introduced yesterday. Of those bills only three may be of specific interest to readers of this blog:

HR 5762 To improve the safety of hazardous materials rail transportation, and for other purposes. Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1]

S 3186 A bill to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for active shooter and mass casualty incident response assistance, and for other purposes. Sen. Carper, Thomas R. [D-DE]

S 3187 A bill to increase the authorization of the National Transportation Safety Board through fiscal year 2020, to require the NTSB to investigate major oil and other hazardous materials derailments, to expand the Secretary of Transportation's emergency order authority, and to require the Secretary of Transportation to establish a volatility standard for crude oil transported by rail. Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]

It is tempting to call the two railroad hazmat bills election year posturing, but that would not be the case for Merkley who is not facing re-election for another four years. It will be interesting to see if these are actually companion bills (identical bills introduced in both houses of Congress).

It will be interesting to see if Carper’s bill addresses the unique issues of response to active shooter incidents at facilities where hazardous chemicals are stored.

Armed and Dangerous

There is a good summary article on WashingtonPost.com about Wednesday’s standoff at the Discovery Building in Silver Springs, MD. The incident points out the value of having a plan for dealing with active shooter situations. Prompt communications with building occupants, an initial lock-down while the situation is stabilized and then an organized evacuation. All of this allowed the authorities to focus their attention on the attacker.

Lone Terrorist

I have yet to see anyone label Lee a terrorist, probably because he had a unique political statement without an affiliated organization. Some people maintain that a terrorist must have some sort of group affiliation to distinguish the violent political act from more common personal delusion that leads to violence. Personally, I fail to see that the distinction has any practical use; people killed or injured by the lone wacko with a political agenda are just as dead as those killed by a small group with a common political delusion.

There are a lot of similarities between Lee and some of the smaller eco-terrorist groups. There is a loose linkage between the manifesto and some of the views of more mainstream ecology groups. The distortion and exaggeration of those links is gross enough and punctuated with enough violence that no mainstream organization will voice even grudging support for the positions. Nor will they do anything to distance themselves from the outrageous ideas until the violence reaches an unacceptable level. We have seen similar responses to the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front.

The main difference between Lee and ALF/ELF is that Lee decided to make his first violent act personal and readily identifiable. If he had instead anonymously attacked the Discovery Channel building, he would have been practically indistinguishable from the active attackers in those organizations.

What will be interesting to see in the coming months is if there is anyone else that take’s up Lee’s manifesto and carry’s on in Lee’s name. This is not an unheard of phenomenon in the political fringes, especially in this country. The internet postings of Lee and the wide spread discussion of the more unusual of his ravings may make this a higher likelihood than it would have been without the publicity.

Practical Lesson

The first thing that everyone needs to learn from this incident is that anyone can become a target for wacked-out political attacks. What triggers some one like Lee to fixate on a particular target is hard to predict. What is clear is that there is usually a well defined escalation of the ‘attacks’ on the target. Recognizing the potential for further escalation allowed the security personnel to mark Lee as a potential threat and ensure that all security personnel were aware of who Lee was. This allowed security personnel to limit Lee’s access to just the lobby of the building.

Of course, not all people who have a disagreement with a facility or organization are expected to escalate to violent attacks. Security personnel do need to be aware of anyone with increasingly strident disagreements with facility management. Still the trainers for those security personnel need to insure that the difference between wariness of potential for violence and the response to violence are clearly delineated. Inadequately trained security personnel can easily cause a premature escalation to a violent confrontation.

Chemical facilities are at special risk of attracting the attention of those with delusions related to environmental issues. This is especially true of facilities that have attracted the attention of legitimate mainstream environmental groups for releases or other actions that may have damaged the local environment or potentially harming local neighbors. The legitimate complaints of such organizations may be enough to set-off a delusional person with real or imagined complaints with that facility.

Active Shooters at Chemical Facilities

One last thing to remember is that many chemical facilities are at special risk for enhanced effects from the actions of an active shooter. At most non-chemical facilities the number of people that will be killed or injured will be relatively a small handful of people. At chemical facilities the random fall of bullets can result in chemical releases. Just the muzzle flash at some facilities can ignite flammable atmospheres resulting in major conflagrations.