Today the DHS Infrastructure Security Compliance Division
posted a brief notice on the CFATS
Knowledge Center about a new study that DHS has contracted with the National
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to perform. The Academies will
produce a report entitled “Reducing the Threat of Improvised Explosive Device
Attacks by Restricting Access to Chemical Explosive Precursors” as a result of
this study.
Background
The notice describes the study this way:
“Under the oversight of the Board
on Chemical Sciences and Technology at the Academies, an ad hoc committee will
identify and prioritize a list of chemicals that have been used either in the
U.S. or internationally or are susceptible for use in IEDs, analyze how the
priority chemicals move through commercial supply chains, assess existing
control measures for the priority chemicals, and suggest controls that might be
effective for a voluntary or regulatory strategy.”
Part of the reason for this study is the problem that ISCD
is having in establishing a cost-effective regulatory strategy for the Ammonium
Nitrate Security Program that the Department was directed to implement by
Congress. While ammonium nitrate is the improvised explosive device precursor
that is best known by the general public, there are a number of other chemicals
that have been used frequently by ‘modern’ terrorists in preparing IEDs. Among
the most common are chemicals like hydrogen peroxide, acetone and nitric acid.
The CFATS program tried to address these IED precursor
chemicals in their list of DHS Chemical of Interest (COI; Appendix A to 6 CFR 27),
but there has not been an effective, formal study of what chemicals could be
(and have been) used to make effective IEDs and what types of cost effective controls
could be used to restrict access to those chemicals by terrorists. The point of
this study is to fill that knowledge gap.
The Study
The notice describes the conduct of the study this way:
“A committee of approximately 14
experts from chemical and engineering disciplines will be appointed by the
Academies drawing members from the academic, industrial, and national lab
sectors. Expertise on the committee will include the following areas:
chemistry, energetic materials, commercial supply chain operations, security,
and law enforcement.”
The Academies have already established a web site to
support the study. That web page provides a little more detail on how the ad
hoc committee will approach this task. They provide a basic five step study
process:
1. Review the available literature
and data, both U.S. and international, to identify and list chemicals that have
been used either in the U.S. or internationally or are susceptible for use in
IEDs. For chemicals found to be currently used in IEDs, identify these
chemicals in order of the most widely used to the least used.
2. For each of the listed
chemicals, analyze how the chemical moves through commercial supply chains.
Assess the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of the supply chains with respect to
susceptibility to theft and diversion of the chemical.
3. Using the information obtained
in Steps 1 and 2 to develop a priority ranking of chemicals to consider for
control and discuss the criteria used.
4. Describe and assess existing
control measures, both in the U.S. and internationally, for the priority
chemicals, including vulnerabilities in the existing framework of voluntary and
regulatory controls.
5. Suggest controls that might be
effective for a voluntary or regulatory strategy and discuss the tradeoffs
between factors such as economics, cost, security, and impact on commerce.
Call for Nominations
The Committee will consist of approximately 14 individuals
that will be appointed by the Academies. The individuals will come from the
following disciplines:
• Chemistry;
• Energetic materials;
• Commercial supply chain
operations;
• Security; and
• Law enforcement
The Academies are soliciting
nominations to serve on the Committee. Nominations should be submitted by
August 22, 2016.
1 comment:
Please ensure that there is a "loophole" to the regulations that allows the possession, transport and use of precursors for explosives detection dog training. Both precursors and their predicted combination MUST be used to conduct training - surrogates and mimetics have repeatedly proven to be ineffective. Peer-reviewed research established that detection training on precursors only does NOT result in dogs that reliably detect the combined substances. If you want dogs that reliably detect ground prilled substance A with ground powdered substance B then training them with a prilled version of substance A just doesn't work for the majority of the dogs.
Post a Comment