On Friday the OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) announced
that it had approved the DOT’s Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety
Administration’s (PHMSA) notice of proposed rulemaking on “Oil Spill Response
Plans and Information Sharing for High-Hazard Flammable Trains”. The advanced
notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) for this rulemaking was
published in August of 2014. The NPRM was sent
to OIRA back in February.
It is interesting to note that there was a significant
change in the title of this rulemaking after the ANPRM was published. Originally
titled: “Oil Spill Response Plans for High-Hazard Flammable Trains”, the new
title (which added the words ‘and Information Sharing’) was first used in the Fall
2015 Unified Agenda. It was not until the Spring 2016 agenda was
published that we were able to see how that might affect the scope of the
rulemaking. The abstract for the rulemaking now states:
“This rulemaking, developed in
consultation with the Federal Railroad Administration, would revise PHMSA's
regulations to expand the applicability of comprehensive oil spill response
plans (OSRPs) based on thresholds of liquid petroleum oil that apply to an
entire train. We are also proposing to revise the format and clarify
requirements of a comprehensive OSRP and to require railroads to
share information [emphasis added] about high-hazard flammable
train operations with state and tribal emergency response organizations (i.e.,
State Emergency Response Commissions and Tribal Emergency Response Commissions)
to improve community preparedness. Lastly, PHMSA is proposing an update
to boiling point testing [emphasis added] procedures to provide
regulatory flexibility and promotes enhanced safety in transport through
accurate packing group assignment.”
The information sharing provisions should be fairly straight
forward, but it will be interesting to see how PHMSA deals with the terrorism fears
on subsequent information sharing by State agencies. What will be very
interesting to see is how PHMSA plans to deal with the crude oil volatility
issue being addressed by the changes to boiling point testing (see my
post about their earlier Safety Advisory on the topic). The wording in
Unified Agenda does not seem to indicate that PHMSA will be using the
controversial vapor pressure testing that many environmental and safety
advocates have been calling for. I have addressed some of the problems with
vapor pressure testing in an earlier
blog post.
No comments:
Post a Comment