On Thursday the Senate took up S
2444, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2014.
Three amendments were considered on the floor of the Senate. Two were passed
and one failed. The bill then passed by a solid bipartisan vote of 93 to 4.
Failed Amendment
The vote on the Coburn (R,OK) Amendment (SA
3549, CREC S4427) was actually a procedural vote that would have waived the
Senate budgetary discipline rules to allow the Secretary of the Treasury to
extend the insurance recoupment deadline in the event that the amount exceeded
$1 billion in any given calendar year.
That procedural vote failed by a largely partisan vote
of 48 to 49; three Democrats voted in the affirmative with the Republicans.
Lacking that waiver a vote on the actual amendment could not
be held.
Adopted Amendments
The amendment by Senator Flake (R,AZ) (SA
3551, CREC S 4427-28) would establish a Federal Advisory Committee on Risk
Sharing Mechanisms. The Committee would “provide advice, recommendations, and
encouragement with respect to the creation and development of the
nongovernmental risk-sharing mechanisms” {§8(b)(2)}.
The amendment passed on a vote
of 97 to 0.
The final amendment did not, strictly speaking, actually deal
with terrorism insurance. Sen. Tester (D,MT) proposed SA
3552 (CREC S 4428-32). It is actually an amendment of 15
USC 6751 et seq, revising the requirements for the National Association of
Registered Agents and Brokers. This amendment is essentially the bill that Sen.
Tester introduced earlier in the session, S
534. While that bill had been voted favorably
reported in Committee, it was likely that the bill never would have made it
to a floor vote on its own.
The amendment passed on a voice vote.
Moving Forward
Last week there had been a possibility that one of the House
introduced bills (HR 4871 was specifically mentioned on the Majority Leader’s
web site) would have been voted on. It never happened and there is no mention
of that bill, or S 2244, on the schedule for this week. With only one more week
before the extended summer recess, it will be interesting to see if the House
takes up this bill or passes HR 4871 and then substitutes the language for that
in S 2244. Or they could just amend S 2244 or adopt it as is.
In any case, if any changes are made before the summer
recess, the bill would be considered by a conference committee and the bill
would probably make it through (even during an electioneering season) before
the election recess.
No comments:
Post a Comment