Showing posts with label S 2775. Show all posts
Showing posts with label S 2775. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

S 2775 Introduced – HACKED Act


Last week Sen Wicker (R,MS) introduced  S 2775, the Harvesting American Cybersecurity Knowledge through Education (HACKED) Act of 2019. The bill would modify a number of existing federal computer training related programs to specifically include cybersecurity training.

Programs Amended


This bill would make amendments to the following programs under the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST):

15 USC 7451 – National cybersecurity awareness and education program;
15 USC 7442 – Federal Cyber Scholarship-for-Service Program; and
15 USC 278g-3 – Computer standards program

This bill would make amendments to the following programs under the National Science Foundation (NSF):

42 USC 1862s-7 - Computer science education research;
42 USC 1862i – Scientific and technical education;
42 USC 1869c – Low-income scholarship program;
42 USC 1869 – Scholarships and graduate fellowships;
42 USC 1881b – Presidential awards for teaching excellence;
42 USC 1862s-6 – Presidential awards for excellence in STEM mentoring; and
42 USC 6621 - Coordination of Federal STEM education

This bill would make amendments to the following programs under the Department of Transportation:

49 USC 5505 - University transportation centers program;
49 USC 6503 - Transportation research and development 5-year strategic plan

Moving Forward


Wicker is the Chair of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee to which this bill was assigned for consideration. The bill is scheduled to be taken up by that Committee today as part of a business meeting. The bill will almost certainly be adopted by a significant bipartisan vote since no new funds are authorized by the bill.

Commentary


The biggest problem with this bill is that there is no definition of ‘cybersecurity’ anywhere in the bill. The underlying definitions for the NIST portions of the bill come from PL113-274. In my blog post about that bill I noted that while “industrial or supervisory control systems” are specifically mentioned in the underlying bill {§2(2)} they are only addressed in reference to IT specific information systems.

There are no definitions of ‘cybersecurity’ in any of the referenced NSF programs or DOT programs.

Now I have previously addressed a number of definitional issues related to cybersecurity. My most comprehensive attempt at coming up with cybersecurity definitions that were clearly applicable to both information and operational cyber systems can be found here. Unfortunately, I did not specifically address the term ‘cybersecurity’. I will try to take that up here.

I do not expect that this bill would be a good place (nor is this Committee the appropriate agent) to address each of the definitions that I proposed earlier, so I will try to accomplish this with just addressing two terms; ‘cybersecurity threat’ and ‘cybersecurity’. First, I would use the existing definition of ‘cybersecurity threat’ from 6 USC 1501; remember that definition relies on the ICS inclusive definition of ‘information system’ from that section. Then I would define ‘cybersecurity’:

Cybersecurity – The term cybersecurity means any actions, policies or procedures utilized to protect an information system (as that term is defined in 6 USC 1501) from a cybersecurity threat (as that term is defined in the same section) or mitigate the effects of a cybersecurity threat against such cybersecurity threat.

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Committee Hearings – Week of 11-10-19


This week both the House and Senate will be in Washington. Of course impeachment hearings will be all in the news, but there are two cybersecurity hearings that may be of interest; one a markup and one an oversight hearing.

Cybersecurity Markup


On Wednesday the Senate Commerce, Science, and Technology Committee will hold a business meeting where 22 bills, four nominations and a routine Coast Guard promotion list will be considered. Among the bills being considered in HR 2775, the Harvesting American Cybersecurity Knowledge through Education (HACKED) Act of 2019.

This bill was introduced last week, and the official copy of the language has yet to be printed. The hearing page has a link to a committee print of the bill. It addresses a wide range of existing cyber training programs. I have not had a chance to peruse it in detail, but there is little in the way of specific reference to control system security training issues beyond a brief mention of issues with automated driving systems.

Cybersecurity Oversight


On Thursday the Technology Modernization Subcommittee of the House Veterans Affairs Committee will hold an oversight hearing on “Cybersecurity Challenges and Cyber Risk Management at the Department of Veterans Affairs.” A witness list has not yet been published.

The hearing web page notes that: “The purpose of the hearing is to assess how the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) manages its cybersecurity program, including controlling access to confidential data, supply-chain management, and the safeguarding of information technology assets.” I guess that means that medical device security issues will not be a major (probably not even a minor) issue in the hearing.

Wednesday, November 6, 2019

Bills Introduced – 11-04-19


Yesterday with the Senate in Washington and the House meeting in pro forma session there were 33 bills introduced. Two of those bills may receive future coverage in this blog:

HR 4987 To provide first responders with planning, training, and equipment capabilities for crude oil-by-rail and ethanol-by-rail derailment and incident response, and for other purposes. Rep. Herrera Beutler, Jaime [R-WA-3]

S 2775 A bill to improve the cyber workforce of the United States, and for other purposes. Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS]

Herrera-Beutler is an outspoken critic of oil trains, especially ones that traverse her district. It will be interesting to see if this bill drifts over into being designed to being an impediment to oil train formation or whether it remains a well-considered emergency response measure.

As always with cyber related bills I will be watching S 2775 for language and definitions to see if this bill specifically addresses control system security training.

 
/* Use this with templates/template-twocol.html */