Last week Rep.
Lipinski (D,IL) introduced HR 2886, the Future Transportation Research and
Innovation for Prosperity (Future TRIP) Act. This is a comprehensive bill
establishing research requirements for the Department of Transportation to
support the development, deployment and regulation of vehicle to vehicle (V2V)
communications.
The bill covers a
wide variety of topics, including:
∙ Automated and connected vehicle research initiative.
∙ University transportation centers program.
∙ Office of science and technology policy working group.
∙ Research and technology development and deployment amendments.
∙ State planning and research additional purposes.
∙ Bureau of transportation statistics.
∙ National cooperative freight transportation research program.
∙ Commercial remote sensing products and spatial information technologies.
∙ Transportation research and development strategic planning.
∙ Centers
for surface transportation excellence.
Readers of this blog
are going to be principally interested in two areas of discussion that are
found within this bill; cybersecurity and hazmat transportation.
Cybersecurity
Section 2 of the
bill requires the Secretary of Transportation to establish an Automated and
Connected Vehicle Research Initiative. Part of the research agenda for that
initiative would be a requirement to look at potential deployment guidance for
the V2V program. The section directs that cyber-physical security would be
included in that guidance.
In §2(h) the Secretary is directed to “establish
a competitively selected Intelligent Transportation Systems Science &
Technology Center”. Part of the purpose of that Center would be to train “the
next generation of the transportation workforce” {§2(h)(3)}in cross-disciplinary fields,
including cybersecurity.
And finally, in §2(i) the bill requires the Secretary to
report to Congress about progress made under this Act. One of the topics in
that report would be guidance on “the relationship of the proposed deployment
of connected and automated vehicles to the national architecture and standards and
protocols” required under 23
USC 517 {§2(i)(4)}.
That guidance is to be based upon:
∙ Cyber-physical security and privacy; and
∙ Examines the interaction with other cyber-physical systems
Hazmat Transportation
One of the key goals
of the V2V program envisioned in this bill it an increase in efficiency in
road-based freight transportation by being able to safely increase the density
and flow of over-the-road transportation. To support that §8 of the bill would add a new §509 to 23 USC. It would require the Secretary
to establish a national cooperative freight transportation research program. The
research agenda supporting that program would include “an emphasis on the safe
and efficient transportation and handling of hazardous materials by all modes
of transportation” {new §509(b)(1)(A)}.
Moving Forward
Lipinski is the
Ranking Member of the Research and Technology Subcommittee of the House
Science, Space and Technology Committee, so he almost certainly has the pull to
get the bill considered by that Subcommittee. Interestingly, he is also a
member of the Highways and Transit Subcommittee in the House Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee, the other Committee that has been given the bill to
consider. It looks like he may be uniquely positioned to help move this bill
through both committees.
This is a complex
bill but one that is probably high on the agenda for many organizations in the
automotive industry. This is one of those bills that, if it makes it to the
floor of the House (and that is not a given at this point) it will probably
have to be considered under a Rule as I would suspect that there would be a
desire to amend the bill on the part of a number of Members.
Commentary
While the topic of
cybersecurity is mentioned in a number of places in this bill, I’m not sure
that there is really enough emphasis on the topic. For example, in the list of
agencies with which the Secretary is required to consult with in establishing
the Research Initiative in §2,
an agency that is strangely absent is DHS which is responsible for
cybersecurity. I would really like to see either US-CERT, ICS-CERT or at least
the DHS Office of Cybersecurity and Communications included on that list.
Because
cybersecurity should be an important component of the V2V initiative I would
have liked to see a specific research initiative set up to look at the issues
of communications security, device security and most importantly cybersecurity
patching. It is unlikely that individual car owners would be watching
government web sites for vulnerability announcements and most would be unable
(and more over un-willing) to deal with firmware updates. This is a study issue
that should be addressed in this bill.
In the freight
transportation realm we have an interesting possibility of being able to solve
one of the long standing problems for first responders coming upon a freight
related accident, telling what hazardous materials may be involved in the
incident. It would be a good idea to include in the freight transportation research
program a requirement to look at using V2V technology to provide manifest and
Safety Data Sheet data to first responders directly from the vehicle
communication system.
Posts
