Today the CISA Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD) updated their Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Monthly Statistics page to provide information for Chemical Security Inspector activities and facility status for the month of November.
CSI Activities
The table below shows the activities conducted by the CSI in November.
Inspection Data |
Aug-20 |
Sep-20 |
Oct-20 |
Nov-20 |
Authorization Inspections |
24 |
31 |
21 |
14 |
Compliance Inspections |
107 |
131 |
90 |
68 |
Compliance Assistance |
115 |
140 |
100 |
102 |
Compliance Audit |
9 |
23 |
5 |
0 |
The web page does not explain the month-to-month variations in the CSI activities. The numbers this month continue the decline in activities that we saw last month. The November numbers dropped to the lowest levels since the Federal Funding Fiasco in December 2018. Since the largest component of that drop is the number of Compliance Inspections conducted, it is possible that this is due to a drop in the number of facilities that are due for their periodic re-inspections; it is just not yet time for the CSI to come back and check facility site security plan compliance again.
Facility Status
The table below shows the status of facilities covered under the CFATS program.
Facility Status |
Aug-20 |
Sep-20 |
Oct-20 |
Nov-20 |
Tiered |
124 |
108 |
90 |
85 |
Authorized |
147 |
159 |
161 |
146 |
Approved |
3056 |
3053 |
3048 |
3050 |
Total |
3327 |
3320 |
3299 |
3281 |
We are continuing to see a rather sharp drop in the number
of facilities covered under the CFATS program. This has been a general trend
since the program began. There is, of course, a financial incentive for
companies to try to reduce their level of risk of a terrorist attack by
reducing or eliminating the inventory of DHS chemicals of interest at the
facility. Unfortunately, with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is also
possible that the sharp decrease seen in covered facilities over the last two
months may be partially attributable to facility closures or declining
manufacturing rates.
No comments:
Post a Comment