Showing posts with label FAQs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FAQs. Show all posts

Sunday, September 6, 2020

ISCD Updates 2 FAQS – 9-4-20


On Friday CISA’s Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD) corrected the responses to two frequently asked questions (FAQs) on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Knowledge Center. The changes were non-substantive editorial changes.

The following FAQ responses were revised Friday:


NOTE: The links provided for all FAQs in this post were copied from the CFATS Knowledge Center but may not work when followed from your machine. This is an artifact of that web site. If the links do not take you to the referenced FAQ you will have to use the ‘Advanced Search’ function on the page to link to the FAQ or download the ‘All FAQs’ document at the bottom of the ‘Advanced Search’ page.

The following changes were made in the referenced FAQs:

#1666 Correct minor typo (caps), and
#1724 Correct minor typo (caps)

Wednesday, September 2, 2020

ISCD Publishes 1 New FAQ and Updates 6 FAQ Responses – 9-2-20


Today CISA’s Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD) published one new frequently asked question (FAQ) and updated responses to six existing FAQ’s on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Knowledge Center. The updates are generally not substantive changes in policy or guidance, but rather issued to increase their ease of use.

New FAQ


The newly published FAQ is:


NOTE: The links provided for all FAQs in this post were copied from the CFATS Knowledge Center but may not work when followed from your machine. This is an artifact of that web site. If the links do not take you to the referenced FAQ you will have to use the ‘Advanced Search’ function on the page to link to the FAQ or download the ‘All FAQs’ document at the bottom of the ‘Advanced Search’ page.

The short answer is found in the first paragraph of the response:

“A covered chemical facility that has closed must report the closure to CISA so that the facility record may be archived. Notification is accomplished by submitting a revised Top-Screen and sending a signed letter to CISA notifying CISA of the facility’s closure.”

This ‘must report’ answer is based upon the requirement in 6 CFR 27.210(d) to report ‘material modifications’ to a facility’s operations or site within 60 days.

Not mentioned in the FAQ response is the necessity of informing ISCD (if you do not do it in your letter submission, they will certainly ask) about the disposition of the remaining DHS chemicals of interest at the site. It is unlikely that ISCD will relieve a facility owner of the responsibility of maintaining the site security plan operations while COI remains on site.

Updated FAQ


The following FAQ responses were revised today:


The following changes were made in the referenced FAQs:

• #1724 – Corrected grammatical error is question,
• #1738 – Added reference to “Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Act of 2014 (CFATS Act)”,
• #1739 – Added links to referenced documents,
• #1758 – Added linked reference to Federal Register Notice,
• #1759 – Added linked reference to Federal Register Notice, and
• #1769 – Changed URL to link to CFR reference.

Tuesday, September 1, 2020

ISCD Updates 3 FAQ Responses – 9-1-20


Today the CISA Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD) updated the responses to three frequently asked questions (FAQ’s) on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Knowledge Center.

With the exception of the response to FAQ #1620, the changes were minor, non-substantive editorial changes dealing with the provision of links to official documents.

The three updated FAQs were:


NOTE: The links provided above were copied from the CFATS Knowledge Center but may not work when followed from your machine. This is an artifact of that web site. If the links do not take you to the referenced FAQ you will have to use the ‘Advanced Search’ function on the page to link to the FAQ or download the ‘All FAQs’ document at the bottom of the ‘Advanced Search’ page.

The following changes were made in the referenced FAQs:

• #1253 – Revised list of questions to be answered in request email,
• #1490 – Changed listing URL’s to link to document name,
• #1620 – Changed snail mail address for reporting CFATS violations.

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

ISCD Updates 3 FAQ Responses – 8-26-20


Today the CISA Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD) updated the responses to three frequently asked questions (FAQs) on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Knowledge Center. The changes were minor, non-substantive editorial changes dealing with the provision of links to official documents.

The three updated FAQs were:


NOTE: The links provided above were copied from the CFATS Knowledge Center but may not work when followed from your machine. This is an artifact of that web site. If the links do not take you to the referenced FAQ you will have to use the ‘Advanced Search’ function on the page to link to the FAQ or download the ‘All FAQs’ document at the bottom of the ‘Advanced Search’ page.

The following changes were made in the referenced FAQs:

• #1398 Added link for ‘40 CFR 261.33’
• #1481 Added link for ‘49 CFR § 171.8’
• #1673 Added link for ‘(73 FR 1640)’

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

ISCD Publishes Two New FAQs


Today the DHS Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD) published two new (mainly) frequently asked questions (FAQs) on their Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Knowledge Center. The responses to both FAQs are videos that run about 8 minutes each.

The two new FAQs are:

#1790 What is CFATS?
#1791 What are Reportable Chemicals?

Sharp eyed readers will recognize that ISCD attempted to publish the second FAQ last Friday but had problems with the video. As I reported earlier (as an addendum to the initial post) the FAQ came down yesterday. Today the FAQ was republished (with today’s date as the ‘date published’) and the videos for both FAQs work.

I am not a big fan of video tutorials, but that probably has more to do with my age than the efficacy of medium. Both videos are fairly typical of the quality one expects to see on video tutorials on YouTube. That is not a criticism, just a statement on the lack of “professional production values” folks of my era would expect to see in a training film.

 
/* Use this with templates/template-twocol.html */