“Having made THREAT my pet peeve several years in a row, this is a lot to bite off in just 4 hours. Needless to say I am skeptical at the true value of a four hour class that promises this much.”Ed is certainly correct that a four hour class trying to cover terror planning methodology will be no more than a brief survey of the field. Those personnel who have any significant counter-terror training will likely find any class of this length to be of very little use. Having said that, there are a huge number of people in the chemical security community with absolutely no counter-terrorism backgrounds. Most facility security managers will be chemists or chemical engineers. They need the access to the very basic level of information that a course like this would cover. Hopefully, they would then go on to other courses that provide the type of knowledge that Ed and I would like to see them exposed to. Unfortunately, I have seen very little counter-terror training directed at this audience. When I do see something, even where it is really only applicable in a fairly small area, I will pass it on. I do wish that I could provide more information on the background of the instructors and the probable quality of the course, but I just don’t have the resources to do that. Again, if any of my readers have any knowledge of counter-terrorism training directed at those with little tactical background or training, please let me know.
News and views about chemical facility security, transportation of hazardous chemicals, and the federal laws and rules governing the same.
Pages
▼
Monday, January 11, 2010
Reader Comment – 01-10-10 – Threat Training
Ed Clark, a consultant with Executive Interface, left a response yesterday to an earlier blog about a terror threat training class being offered in Winston-Salem, NC. He wrote:
No comments:
Post a Comment