tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9122514974659083342.post5553148482527247971..comments2024-02-02T22:30:20.736-05:00Comments on Chemical Facility Security News: Reader Comment 03-24-10 LEPCPJCoylehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03390039682578324978noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9122514974659083342.post-87067077897769679422010-04-01T22:44:39.404-04:002010-04-01T22:44:39.404-04:00"Allowing this exaggerated information to sta..."Allowing this exaggerated information to stand unchallenged is a complete abrogation of their hazard communication responsibility..." <br /><br />Dear PJ,<br /><br />I respect the spirit of your commentary. Recognizing that wind speed, humidity and dispersion rates impact the spread of a "threat cloud", I would suggest that there are companies that work with chlorine and anhydrous ammonia that are in close communication with LEPCs'.<br /><br />Perhaps the LEPCs' could stand up and recognize the companies that share the risks of onsite poison inhalation hazards and demonstrate corporate citizenship in their respective communities.<br /><br />Jim Lupacchino<br />Director, Operational Support<br /><a href="http://www.dayzim.com/Services_and_Products/Security" rel="nofollow">Day & Zimmermann Security Services</a>Jim Lupacchinonoreply@blogger.com